Landfill Consolidation and Environmental Improvements Grants Program

Program snapshot

Category: Waste and Sustainable Materials Strategy

Amounts: total funding pool up to $6 million

Eligibility: NSW councils in the Regional Levy Area (RLA) and Non-Levied Area (NLA) of NSW; or, Regional Organisations of Councils or Joint Organisations of Councils.

Contact: [email protected]

Status: Closed, funding exhausted.

Managed by: NSW Environment Protection Authority

Aims

Regional NSW has a number of licensed and unlicensed landfills which may be suitable for closure and consolidation. Reasons for closure include end of life, capacity restrictions, low usage by local community, remote location, financial pressures, environmental pressures, social impact on community and impacts on aesthetics and amenity in and around the local area.

Consolidation of council landfills can provide councils the opportunity to strategically review existing landfills to funnel waste to strategically important sites, or to use funding for improvements to convert underutilised landfills into transfer stations. The closure and consolidation of local landfills and transfer of waste to an alternative facility can improve the potential for increased resource recovery and lower environmental risks.

Program guidelines

1. Objectives

The objective of the Landfill Consolidation and Environmental Improvements (LCEI) Grants Program is to provide funding for regional and remote councils in the RLA and NLA of NSW to close or improve landfill and transfer station sites. The Program aims to:

  • support regional NSW local councils carry out site-specific improvement works to council-managed landfill and transfer station facilities
  • consolidate and close regional landfills at end of life or where councils have identified viable alternatives for waste disposal via the Council Waste Management Strategy or Regional Waste Strategy
  • establish site-specific transfer stations at the location of the closed landfill site
  • improve environmental and human health and well-being in communities
  • improve management, safety and operation of landfills and transfer stations
  • provide access to advisory services and education on best practice methods to improve waste management practices and landfill management efficiency, including to extend the life of landfills
  • encourage use of the E-RAMP tool to assess sites at most risk and suitable for closure.
2. Outcomes

The LCEI Program delivers a number of key environmental outcomes:

  • high risk landfills are closed or converted to transfer stations
  • contribute to the long-term protection of the environment in regional and remote areas of NSW
  • improved safety, amenity and security at rural landfills
  • communities improve or maintain access to dispose of household waste in rural areas
  • councils have the skills to extend the life of existing landfill through access to technical specialists and manage risks at landfill and transfer station sites
  • program outcomes and data are shared with EPA to inform future policies and programs
  • alignment to targets listed in the Waste and Sustainable Materials Strategy 2041:
    • have an 80% average recovery rate from all waste streams by 2030
    • halve the amount of organic waste sent to landfill by 2030
    • net zero emissions from organic waste by 2030
    • 60% reduction in all litter items by 2030
    • triple the plastics recycling rate by 2030
    • reduce illegal dumping.
 
3. Eligibility

3.1. Eligible organisations

Organisations that are eligible to apply must:

  • be located in the Regional Levy Area (RLA) or the Non-Levied Area (NLA) and;
  • be located in a NSW council (as defined in the NSW Local Government Act), or;
  • be a Regional waste group (RWG), Regional Organisations of Councils (ROC) or Joint Organisations of Councils (JOC). These organisations may apply and/or coordinate the project on behalf of several NSW councils within their regional group, provided each council nominates a contact person for the project.

3.2. Partnership projects

Partnership projects are encouraged as they can improve the implementation, efficiency, and economic benefits of projects. If multiple councils are seeking to partner on the negotiation, planning for and contracting of waste services, including procurements for constructing new facilities, please explore how your proposal may be eligible within the Joint Procurement Funded Support Program.

3.3. Multiple applications

Applicants may submit multiple applications. It is at the applicant's discretion as to how they will manage grant administration of multiple sites. They may choose to have multiple sites within one application if all projects in the one application can be delivered within the funding limit, or submit a new application for each individual site.

For multiple individual applications, the applicants must indicate order of priority and strategic alignment of the project to Council or Regional Waste Strategies. If several sites are being proposed, applicants must provide evidence of sufficient resources and capacity to complete multiple projects. 

Applicants are also expected to maintain separate recordkeeping for each grant including tracking expenditure of in-kind and cash contributions for each project individually.

Regional applications are welcome for multiple landfill sites, but a separate risk assessment and site layout must be completed for each waste facility included in the application.

3.4. Conditions of eligibility

Applications that do not satisfy the conditions below will be deemed ineligible and will not be assessed.

3.4.1. General conditions

Eligible organisations must meet the following conditions to qualify for funding in any of the three streams:

  • complete all relevant NSW EPA forms and supporting documents
  • application is authorised by the names of two senior officers in your organisation (e.g. General Manager, CEO, Chief Financial Officer, Group Manager or Secretary) who can attest to the accuracy of the information within the application
  • demonstrate that the project is aligned with the program’s objectives and outcomes, provides value for money, delivers public benefits, and will deliver environment and human health improvements
  • complete separate risk assessments for each site/facility proposed in the application
  • provide separate site layouts for each site/facility proposed in the application
  • for organisations submitting multiple applications, provide a priority list ranking the sites/facility in order of importance and preference for funding
  • submit projects that can be completed within two years
  • provide at least two contact people within the eligible organisation who will be responsible for delivering the project, ongoing grant management and available to respond to questions from the EPA.
3.4.2. Stream specific conditions

In addition to the general conditions of eligibility listed above, eligible organisations must meet the following conditions for specific streams listed below:

Stream 1 – Consolidation and transformation

  • At the time of application, the site/facility must be operational and receiving waste from the community, or have been operational in the 12 months prior to the time of application, OR;
  • The site/facility has been non-operational and is a high priority for closure, and;
  • The site/facility closure plans meet the minimum standards set out in Environmental Guidelines: Solid waste landfills, as appropriate, and;
  • Submission of a completed E-RAMP assessment of the subject site/facility if less than 5,000 tonnes of waste per annum, or​ your own risk assessment if your site/facility accepts more than 5,000 tonnes per annum.

Stream 2 – Environmental Improvements

  • At the time of application, the site/facility must be operational and receiving waste from the community, and;
  • Submission of a completed E-RAMP assessment of the subject site/facility if less than 5,000 tonnes of waste per annum, or​ your own risk assessment if your site/facility accepts more than 5,000 tonnes per annum.

Stream 3 – Advisory Services and education

  • At the time of application, the subject facility must be operational and receiving waste from the community, or have been operational in the 12 months prior to the time of application, and;
  • Submission of a completed E-RAMP assessment of the subject site/facility if less than 5,000 tonnes of waste per annum, or​ your own risk assessment if your site/facility accepts more than 5,000 tonnes per annum.
3.4.3. Ineligible conditions

An organisation is not eligible to apply for this funding if the organisation is not compliant with NSW environment protection laws.

 
4. Funding

4.1. Funding limits and minimum co-contribution

Stream 1 – Consolidation and transformation

Grants of up to $300,000 are available for Stream 1, covering up to 70% of the eligible project costs relating to landfill closure, consolidation, and construction of transfer stations. Applicants must meet a minimum of 30% cash and in-kind contributions. All project expenses, including cash and in-kind contributions must be clearly identified in the Application Budget.

Funding from other grants or programs must not be included as the co-contribution.

Stream 2 – Environmental Improvements

Grants of up to $250,000 are available for Stream 2, covering up to 70% of the eligible project costs relating to environmental improvements to landfills. Applicants must meet a minimum of 30% of cash and in-kind contributions. All project expenses, including cash and in-kind contributions must be clearly identified in the Application Budget.

Funding from other grants or programs must not be included as the applicant’s co-contribution.

Stream 3 – Advisory Services and education

Grants of up to $25,000 are available for Stream 3, covering up to 50% of the eligible project costs of advisory services relating to landfill closure plans, consolidation plans, environmental improvement plans, feasibility assessments for transformation, design and technical engineering plans and education courses to upskill Council staff in waste management. Applicants must meet a minimum of 50%of cash and in-kind contributions. All project expenses, including cash and in-kind contributions must be clearly identified in the Application Budget.

4.2. Projects and items that will be funded

If your proposal focus is not included on the list, please contact the EPA to discuss your project and eligible items for funding. Examples of items eligible for funding include but are not limited to the lists below.

4.2.1. Stream 1 – Landfill consolidation and transformation

Landfill closure and consolidation

  • final capping material consisting of Virgin Excavated Natural Material (VENM) or
  • excavated Natural Material (ENM) that meets technical specifications for final capping
  • equipment hire costs for undertaking closure works
  • project related improvement works to meet closure requirements
  • fencing to enclose the site
  • new signage including poles indicating the site is closed. Signage must acknowledge the funding from the NSW EPA
  • rehabilitation works
  • remediation works
  • revegetation
  • leachate barriers and catchment
  • post-closure groundwater monitoring
  • waste collection equipment (such as tip trucks) will be eligible for funding if it can be demonstrated that this equipment will assist in landfill closure.

Building transfer stations

  • project related internal road improvements up to a maximum of 20%of the grant amount
  • demountable buildings up to a maximum of 20% of the grant amount
  • site preparation costs such as slabs and retaining walls up to 20% of the grant amount
  • storage bunkers or bins for separated materials
  • site automation systems that increase operational performance.

4.2.2. Stream 2 – Environmental improvements

Environmental improvements

  • equipment hire costs for undertaking improvement works
  • fencing in or around the site/facility
  • litter control to prevent windblown litter
  • new signage including poles. Signage must acknowledge the funding from the NSW EPA
  • site security and supervision infrastructure
  • non-consumable alternative daily cover (e.g. tarps)
  • purchase of plant and equipment that will bring about environmental improvements through operational improvement – examples include landfill compaction equipment
  • material separation equipment – examples include mulchers, glass breakers and balers
  • stormwater or sedimentation contouring earthworks (not collection systems)
  • groundwater collections systems
  • groundwater monitoring.

4.2.3. Stream 3 – Advisory Services and education

Advisory services

Funding for professional services. In some cases, documents developed in Stream 3 could inform subsequent applications under Stream 1 and 2.

Examples of items eligible for funding include, but are not limited to, the list below:

  • consolidation options assessment
  • feasibility assessments for transformation
  • landfill closure plans
  • capping system design
  • design plans for infrastructure and civil works
  • surface water management plans
  • leachate management plans
  • stockpile material assessments
  • post-closure management plans
  • rehabilitation design
  • site layout plans
  • surface water management plan.
Education

Courses aimed at improving operational and environmental management of landfills and transfer stations. Examples include operator training for best practice management at consolidated landfill.

Education and training courses must be delivered by Registered Training Organisations approved by the Australian Skills Quality Authority.

4.3. Projects and items that will not be grant funded

The below list of items will not​ be grant funded under the program. The EPA may, at its absolute discretion, update or add to the items and projects that will not be funded at any time.

  • projects not located in NSW
  • projects and budget items that do not align with the objectives of the grant program
  • projects that would proceed without grant funding, and requests for retrospective funding
  • projects that seek to jointly procure waste services, these projects will be directed to the Joint Procurement Funded Support Program.
  • project proposals submitted by applicants who are unable to show the financial capability to complete the project
  • costs of obtaining approvals or environment protection licences
  • purchase of plant or equipment that has been previously owned by any associated entity
  • process or logistic vehicles, e.g. fork-lifts, prime movers, front-end loaders
  • freight and shipping fees including customs and/or duties, e.g. for new equipment
  • project activities or equipment that applicants have received via funding or support from other funding sources (e.g. other grant programs)
  • ongoing operational costs such as, but not limited to, rent, insurance, salaries, electricity, water and other utilities
  • costs associated with internal administration, travel, office support and communications
  • costs associated with the application or gaining of funding, eg. consultant fees or legal fees
  • land acquisition and venture capital
  • project contingency funds.

4.4. Funding schedule

Round 5 will be a continuously open funding round, assessed in intakes. Applications will be reviewed and funding awarding every 5 months, until funding is exhausted.

Indicative dates

MilestoneEstimated date
Program opens6 December 2024
Intake 1 closes11:59pm, Friday 28 March 2025
Intake 1 assessmentApril – May 2025
Intake 1 approved projects announcedJune 2025
Intake 2 opensJuly 2025
Intake 2 closesNovember 2025
Intake 2 assessmentDecember 2025
Intake 2 approved projects announced
 
January 2026
Intake 3 opens
 
February 2026
Intake 3 closes
 
July 2026
Intake 3 assessment
 
August 2026
Intake 3 approved projects announced*
 
September 2026

*Three intakes are listed in the table above, if funding is still available following the announcement of successful applicants in September 2026, a fourth intake will commence. Conversely, if all funding is awarded in intakes 1 and 2, intake 3 will not be offered.

 
5. Assessment criteria

Eligible applications will be assessed by an independent Technical Review Committee against the assessment criteria, set out below. The information in the application form will allow the Technical Review Committee to recommend projects based on merit and to comparatively assess each project.

All questions in the application forms should be answered fully and responses should be prepared with these criteria in mind.

5.1. Assessment criteria for Streams 1 and 2

Criterion 1 – 40%

The project shows need for better waste management and articulates why it is of priority.

  • The application describes, with supporting evidence, how it delivers on the program objectives and outcomes.
  • The application has a completed risk assessment that addresses current operational condition and mitigations for the proposed site/facility.
  • The application describes the need and/or priority of activities for the site/facility, including remaining landfill capacity and estimated throughput, where relevant to the application.
  • The application describes how it delivers on broader strategies, including but not limited to: Council Waste Strategies, Regional Waste Strategies, NSW Government priorities.
  • The application shows project support from council and any other decision-making authorities.
  • The application describes a long-term strategy for continued management and future use of the site/facility.

Criterion 2 – 30%

The applicant and any project partners have shown an ability to deliver the project to a high standard.

  • The application describes the resources required to deliver the project. For instance, project team capacity and capability.
  • The application shows sound project planning and methodology to deliver the project within two years.
  • The application shows compliance with environmental laws, including how activities will be delivered to best practice.
  • If in the previous 12 months, the application describes regulatory action taken against the applicant or project partners and describes how the matters were satisfactorily resolved.
  • The application describes a robust process for monitoring, evaluating and reporting on the success or failure of the project and has appropriate evaluation measures in place.

Criterion 3 – 20%

The project provides economic, environmental and/or social benefits for the community of NSW.

  • The application describes how communities will maintain access to waste services, including community engagement and/or education.
  • The application has a credible business case with clear potential to deliver ongoing outcomes.
  • The application describes other economic value that will result from the project.
  • The application describes other environmental benefits.
  • The application describes social benefits, including job creation and/or vocational training for disadvantaged or marginalised communities in NSW.
  • The application describes how it will support knowledge sharing. For instance, with other local councils.

Criterion 4 – 10%

The project shows value for money.

  • The application pricing and service offering are viable and credible.
  • The application budget shows the required 30%or more co-contribution has been committed, with supporting evidence.

5.2. Assessment criteria for Stream 3

Criterion 1 – 40%

The project shows it will deliver information that is relevant and useful.

  • The application clearly describes, with supporting evidence, how it delivers on the program objectives and outcomes.
  • The application has a completed risk assessment that addresses current operational condition and mitigations for the proposed site/facility.
  • The application describes how it will address an issue or knowledge gap.
  • The application describes how the activities are of interest or value. For instance, of council priority, localities an/or communities.

Criterion 2 – 30%

The project shows intention to act on information delivered.

  • The application describes how the information delivered will help inform future management and future use of the site/facility.
  • The application shows there is a financial commitment to act on the information delivered once the project is complete. For instance, planning for activities within budgetary cycles or how new learnings will be embedded as business as usual.
  • The application describes how it will support knowledge sharing. For instance, with other local councils.

Criterion 3 – 20%

The project shows how it will deliver on strategic priorities.

  • The application describes how it delivers on broader strategies, including but not limited to: Council Waste Strategies, Regional Waste Strategies, NSW Government priorities.
  • The application describes how the information delivered will contribute to long-term protection of the environment and communities.

Criterion 4 – 10%

The project shows value for money.

  • The application pricing and service offering are viable and credible.
  • The application shows that multiple quotes have been sought.
  • The application budget shows the required 50% or more co-contribution has been committed, with supporting evidence.
 
6. Application budget

6.1. Budget Overview

The Application Budget is an Excel document, additional to the main application form and is accessed within SmartyGrants.

An incorrect or incomplete Application Budget form may render the application ineligible or reduce the Technical Review Committee’s confidence in your capacity to deliver the project and manage project finances. If you are unclear about what is eligible and ineligible or how to complete the budget spreadsheet, please contact the EPA to discuss.

All items in your budget need to be detailed, reasonable and justifiable, especially where individual items comprise a large proportion of the overall budget. Detailed costing ensures that your budget is well planned and linked to the objectives and activities of your project. Be specific and give unit values where possible.

You will be required to report all project expenses as part of ongoing grant reporting requirements. Ensure you can provide a corresponding invoice and proof of payment for all expenditure when you come to the reporting stage.

6.2. Cash and in-kind contributions

Applicants should list all cash expenses and in-kind contributions in their application budget to demonstrate it meets the required 30% co-contribution. In-kind contributions are activities towards the project other than money. Examples include:

  • staff time to manage a project
  • voluntary labour
  • use of existing internal resources, e.g. installation or use of equipment.

The EPA values the ability of an applicant to demonstrate cash and in-kind contributions that reflect support for a project and add value for money.

6.3. Taxation – Goods and Services Tax (GST)

GST applies to payments made under this grant program. However, some grants of financial assistance may be subject to income tax in the hands of certain recipients. It is therefore recommended that you, as the applicant, seek independent legal and financial advice if uncertain about your organisation’s taxation obligations.

Organisations administering a grant (and registered for GST) are not to include GST in the application budget figures. The EPA will add 10 per cent GST to the grant payment.

Organisations administering a grant that are not registered for GST are to include in the application budget any GST that will be incurred during the life of the project.

 
7. How to apply

Use SmartyGrants to apply for funding.

If you have any issues accessing the platform or completing any questions, please email [email protected].

7.1. Application support services

The EPA provides a free application support service to eligible applicants to help improve their Stream 1 and Stream 2 grant applications. This service is provided by an independent contractor and will provide application advice. Under the service the EPA provides up to 6 hours of support to eligible Stream 1 and 2 applicants.

The role of the application advisors will be to:

  • provide specialist advice to the applicant as it prepares its grant application
  • advise on appropriate analysis, content and presentation of information
  • provide comment and critical feedback on the quality of the application presented.

The application advisors may cover the following areas:

  • presenting evidence base for project need
  • highlighting priority of the project and how it links with broader waste strategy
  • assistance undertaking E-RAMP risk assessment
  • communicating environmental, financial and social benefits of the project
  • feedback on project planning.

EPA-funded application advisors will not:

  • gather background information, although they can advise on where to access the necessary information.
  • prepare a complete business case on behalf of the applicant
  • prepare a complete grant application on behalf of the applicant.

The service is at the discretion of the EPA and not all applicants will necessarily receive the support service. A decision by the EPA not to provide the support service does not imply that the project is ineligible for funding. Conversely, receiving the support service does not guarantee application success.

Please email [email protected] to request the application support service. If successful in applying for the service, the EPA will arrange a meeting time with the advisor. Advisors are contracted by the EPA and are bound to keep information provided by applicants confidential.

All requests for the application support service for Intake 1 must be before 28 February 2025.

7.2. Who to contact for assistance

Please contact the Waste and Recycling Infrastructure team at [email protected] for assistance with application submissions.

 
8. Obligations of successful applicants

8.1. Funding Deed

Successful applicants will be required to enter into a performance-based Funding Deed with the EPA which will stipulate all funding obligations and conditions. The EPA will monitor the performance and progress of projects through agreed milestones. Funding is provided against agreed milestones and continuing funding is dependent on satisfactory milestone reports.

Successful applicants will have up to 30 days from the date an offer of funding is formally notified by the EPA, to sign the Funding Deed. If the Deed is not signed within the specified period, the offer of funding may lapse.

Successful applicants will be required to comply with all conditions contained in the Funding Agreement, including, but not limited to:

  • confirm a final schedule of payment and reporting dates relative to project activities
  • provide progress reports and final reports in accordance with the reporting requirements outlined in the Funding Agreement
  • provide a Statement of Expenditure with each progress report, and include a Final Statement of Expenditure at the final report that is signed by the applicant council’s chief financial officer, or if a non-government organisation, an independent auditor
  • provide all related invoice and proof-of-payments to the EPA that correlates to the Statement of Expenditure
  • provide a landfill closure management plan at the second progress report, as appropriate to the project.
    • Applicants must consider the EPA Solid Waste Landfill Guidelines in designing and implementing the landfill closure management plan. The landfill closure management plan must identify a program that ensures the site does not cause environmental harm after closure.
  • provide written evidence from any project partners that confirms they are contributing funds or resources to the project
  • demonstrate that all necessary planning, regulatory or other approvals have been granted, to ensure all project activities are completed within the designated timeframe
  • provide a Tax Invoice to the EPA for each grant instalment, with GST added where relevant
  • seek prior approval from the EPA for any variation to the agreed project plan, project measures, timeframe or budget
  • acknowledge the EPA in all promotional material and public statements about your project
    • The acknowledgement must include the appropriate NSW government or EPA logos in accordance with publishing requirements. Logos and requirements for use to be downloaded from the EPA website.
  • agree that all knowledge gained as part of the grant must be publicly available e.g. through publishing a case study or promoting the project via other avenues
  • invite EPA representatives to any launch or public event associated with this project, and where they can attend, that they are acknowledged as official guests and provided an opportunity to publicly address the event.

8.2. Project duration

The EPA receives strict annual funding allocations for its programs, with limited capacity to carry over funds to future financial years. Successful applicants will be required to:

  • Commence the project within three months of signing the Funding Deed, which includes obtaining all approvals, quotes and advertising tenders. If a project does not commence within four months, without justification the EPA may revoke the grant.
  • Commit to have the project completed by no later than two years from project commencement. For projects that are not completed within two years, you will be required to justify why the grant should not be terminated.

The EPA considers requests for variations to your project plan, project measures, timeframe or budget. These should be submitted as soon as possible when known by you. Significant extensions of time will only be approved under exceptional circumstances with evidenced justification.

8.3. Ongoing project reporting

Successful applicants will be required to provide progress reports and final reports in accordance with the timelines and reporting requirements that will be outlined in the Funding Agreement. Progress reports must include details on all the activities completed in that period, photos and videos of progress, outcomes, and next steps. A statement of expenditure, with correlating invoices and proof of payment must be provided with each report. Grant recipients must also provide an evaluation report at project completion, including the development of a project case study.

 
9. Assessment of application

9.1. Assessment and approval process

After the intake closing date, the EPA will check whether your application is eligible and complete.

The EPA establishes an independent Technical Review Committee (TRC) for each grant program. Each TRC is made up of people with knowledge and experience relevant to each grant program. TRC members agree to undertake their duties within the principles of ethical conduct, integrity, objectivity and independence. They are also required to keep all matters concerning applications confidential and to declare any potential conflict of interest. The TRC membership is confidential to avoid opportunity for influence.

The TRC assessment process also involves consultation with relevant EPA staff. The TRC will assess the merit of your application by using the assessment criteria outlined in these guidelines. The TRC then makes recommendations to the EPA who will ultimately approve the funding. The assessment process is overseen by an independent probity auditor.

Successful applicants may not receive the full amount requested and the offer of funding may be subject to special, as well as general, conditions of funding. The EPA may also include conditions that may not have been addressed in these guidelines, should a particular issue come to light during the assessment process.

Unsuccessful applicants can request feedback on their applications from the EPA via [email protected].

Decisions by the EPA are final. There is no appeal process.

9.2. Notification of grant decisions

The NSW Minister for the Environment, or the EPA, may publicly announce the successful grant applications. Applicants will also be notified in writing. Applicants must not publicly promote the outcomes of funding decisions until the NSW Government, or the EPA, formally announces the funding outcomes.

9.3. Conflict of interest

Applicants are required to declare any real, potential or perceived conflict of interest that they may be aware of in relation to being awarded a grant, particularly where:

  • the project that you are proposing will be undertaken on private land and that land is owned by a member or members (or relatives) of the organisation applying for a grant
  • members, or relatives of members, of the organisation applying for a grant are being paid as project managers (or similar) with EPA funds
  • members, or relatives of members, of the organisation applying for a grant are being paid as contractors with EPA funds
  • works carried out by the project could create current or future financial or other benefit for members of the organisation applying for the grant, or their relatives
  • third parties used to assist in the preparation of the grant application will potentially be engaged to carry out work on the project.

Such circumstances do not exclude the project from being funded; however, they must be acknowledged as a potential conflict of interest. The TRC will assess each situation on its merits.

9.4. Misleading or false information

Applicants must certify that all the information in the application is true and correct.

Applications that include misleading or false information will not be considered for funding. If the EPA is made aware of any issues relating to misleading or false information after a grant has been awarded, the grant will be revoked and funds, plus interest, must be repaid. An assessment regarding possible fraud will also be undertaken and appropriate legal action initiated if warranted.

 
10. Confidentiality
The EPA will use the information you supply to it to assess your project. The EPA may share this information with other NSW Government and Commonwealth Government agencies and consultancies, on a confidential basis. Some of this information may also be used for promotional purposes. Otherwise, subject to legal requirements of disclosure, the EPA will endeavour to treat sensitive personal and private information that you provide confidentially. If you require strict commercial confidentiality, you should request this in your application. However, all documents held by the EPA are subject to the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009.
 

Previous rounds and recipients

Round 5

In August 2025, the EPA awarded $5.9 million to councils of NSW for 35 projects under Round 5 Intake 1 of the LCEI program.

OrganisationFunding amountProject
Armidale Regional Council$300,000

Guyra Landfill Rehabilitation

The former Guyra Landfill was an unlicensed, unlined facility. It received waste from the 1960s until at least 1993. The site is next to Urandangie Creek, which flows into Malpas Dam. In the mid-1990s, it was turned into a waste and recycling transfer station, and is still operating today. Recycled materials are stored on unsealed surfaces before being moved elsewhere. Funding to close the old landfill will support building a capping system. This will reduce infiltration, leachate generation and greenhouse gases, and fix eroded areas and cover exposed waste. The upgrade will also improve how the recycling transfer station operates and reduce the risk of stormwater runoff.

Blayney Shire Council$25,000

Planning the Expansion of the Eastern Landfill at Blayney Waste Facility

This project is about early planning and design work to prepare for expanding the Blayney Waste Facility into the Eastern Landfill area in the future.

Blayney Shire Council$15,000

Waste Management plan - Blayney Waste Facility

This project will create a waste management strategy for the Blayney Waste Facility. The strategy will focus on two areas. First, assessing landfill capacity to understand how much waste the eastern part of the landfill can hold now and in the future. Secondly, assessing options for other ways the site could manage waste more effectively.

Blue Mountains City Council$250,000

Upgrades at Blaxland Solid Waste Facility

This project involves buying and installing a tarpaulin based Alternative Daily Cover system at the Blaxland Solid Waste Facility. The new system will reduce how much Virgin Excavated Natural Material (VENM) is needed for daily cover. The new system will preserve VENM and landfill capacity. The project includes installing portable litter fences to reduce windblown litter at the active tipping area. Concrete blocks will also be installed to help separate waste and recycling on site. 

Brewarrina Shire Council$300,000

Capping the Landfill at Brewarrina Waste Depot

The landfill cell at Brewarrina Waste Depot is almost full. Brewarrina Shire Council will carry out earthworks to cap and close the landfill, following NSW EPA environmental guidelines. The project includes placing up to 15,000 cubic metres of soil to landform the site so that stormwater drains more easily and reduces infiltration.

Central Darling Shire Council$25,000

Review of Waste Sites in Central Darling Shire

This project will review the condition and operations of six landfill sites across Central Darling Shire. The goal is to create improvement plans based on risk, and upgrade at least three sites to help them perform better environmentally. It also aims to improve waste management and reduce landfill risk. The sites in this project include Wilcannia, Menindee, Ivanhoe, Tilpa, White Cliffs and Sunset Strip.

Coonamble Shire Council$17,770

Putting Coonamble Shire’s Waste Strategy into Action

Coonamble Shire Council is consolidating its operations to streamline how waste is managed in its local area. This project provides expert advice on waste transfer station operations, including how to setup and run a LBin system at Quambone Waste Transfer Station and Coonamble Waste Management Facility. It also includes guidance and staff training for both sites.

Cowra Shire Council$25,000

Glenlogan Road Landfill advisory project

This project will help Cowra Council improve safety, reduce risks, and better manage the landfill to meet community expectations.  The council will finalise the landfill design, update the Landfill Environmental Management Plan and provide a filling plan to guide future operations. The updates will aim to meet the NSW EPA guidelines. The advice provided will support best practice methods that protect the environment and community health, while helping extend the life of the landfill.

Dubbo Regional Council$300,000

Closing the Wellington Landfill and building a transfer station

Dubbo Regional Council is creating a plan to safely close and manage the Wellington Waste Transfer Station in New South Wales. The plan will outline operational needs and future rehabilitation work, following NSW EPA guidelines. The council will transform the site into a Waste and Recycling Centre, which will operate as a transfer station.

Dungog Shire Council$249,250

Upgrading the Dungog Waste Management Facility

The Dungog Waste Management Facility is getting upgrades to boost safety and environmental management. This includes better stormwater systems and a covered oil bund to reduce runoff contamination from heavy metals and oils. Moveable litter fences will reduce windblown litter. Security is a major concern due to frequent break-ins and illegal dumping. Installing CCTV, motion-sensor lights, and fences will help stop people from breaking in or stealing. Upgrading  the roads at the facility will improve access for the community and help traffic move safely and smoothly. An automated gate at the main access point will ensure controlled contractor access. Signage will improve wayfinding and security awareness.

Forbes Shire Council$250,000

Improving operations at Forbes Recycling & Waste Depot

Forbes Shire Council is consolidating and improving waste operations for efficiency, compliance, and safety. The main site getting upgrades is the Forbes Recycling & Waste Depot. The Council wants to improve how waste is received to meet EPA standards, recover more items that can be reused or recycled, and management of problem waste like asbestos and dead animals.

Gilgandra Shire Council$25,000

Reviewing Gilgandra’s Waste Management Plan

Gilgandra’s main plan for managing waste is being reviewed and updated. The project will consider key strategic documents, policy and legislative directions. The review will look at waste generation impacts from state significant projects, FOGO mandate and implications for Council, on-site operations, filling practices & trends, traffic flow and recommendations to improve environmental and operational performance, maximise diversion of waste from landfill and ensure longevity. This will provide recommendations and costs for future strategic plans.

Kempsey Shire Council$250,000

Permanent Leachate Treatment System

The Kempsey Waste Management Centre will install a new system to treat leachate and stormwater. The new permanent system will replace a trial unit. It will use physical, biological, and disinfecting methods to treat up to 60 million litres each year. Along with a new irrigation system, it will help the site reduce its impact on the environment.

Lachlan Shire Council$66,797

Closing the Burcher Landfill

On 26 February 2025, Lachlan Shire Council decided to close the Burcher landfill and extend household waste collection services to the residents of Burcher. The Burcher landfill is unsupervised and is used by people from outside the local area to dump unwanted waste. There is local support for closing the landfill and transforming the site into a small vehicle waste transfer station.

Leeton Shire Council$300,000

Yanco Landfill Closure and Remediation

The old Yanco landfill will be remediated to reduce risks linked to asbestos contamination. The work includes installing a marker geotextile layer over contaminated areas, capping the site with half a metre of clean fill, and improving surface water management. These steps will make the area safer, prevent erosion, and align with NSW EPA guidelines. The closure will remove risks of asbestos exposure, improve the environment, and allow the land to be used more safely in the future.

Lismore City Council$300,000

Improvement works at Lismore Landfill Cells 1 and 2A

Lismore City Council is getting ready to cap Landfill Cells 1 and 2A. But first, remediation work is needed. The project will meet geotechnical and slope stability design plans. Work includes buttressing embankment walls, slope reinforcement and structural improvements such as retaining walls or sheet piling. This will make the landfill stronger to enable final capping, meet safety standards, improve site resilience and reduce contamination risks in the future.

Lismore City Council$25,000

Design plans for Landfill Cells 1 and 2A at Lismore City Council Resource Recovery Centre

Lismore City Council is designing detailed plans for two landfill areas - Cell 1 and Cell 2A. The geotechnical and slope stability designs will help improve how leachate and gas is managed, and support long-term environmental performance. They will also help the Council follow NSW EPA guidelines. This work is part of a larger effort to improve landfill operations and provide better regional waste services.

Lithgow City Council$250,000

Portland Garbage Depot Supervision and Resource Recovery Upgrade

The Portland Garbage Depot is getting an upgrade to help sorting and resource recovery opportunities, and prevent illegal dumping. The project will reduce environmental risks and improve landfill diversion. The site is a largely unsupervised rural landfill where residents dispose of waste on the ground at the tip face. There are some piles for scrap metal and green waste, but they can be easily contaminated. Although there are cameras on site, the site is not permanently staffed meaning the landfill can be misused. The new upgrades will add LBins, skip bins, and mixed recycling bins. Residents won’t have access to the tipping area anymore. The site will be staffed, opening hours will be shorter, and visitors will be guided to sort their waste correctly.

Lithgow City Council$60,900

Installation of litter fences at Lithgow Solid Waste Facility

Six new litter fences are being put up at the Lithgow Solid Waste Facility. These fences will help reduce windblown litter and keep the nearby bushland clean and safe.

Liverpool Plains Shire Council$300,000

Werris Creek Landfill Closure

Liverpool Plains Shire Council is closing the Werris Creek landfill. The site will be rehabilitated to restore the land and prevent long-term contamination risks and improve environmental conditions. The project includes capping of waste, erosion and sediment control, and leachate management. Improvements include land stabilisation, better stormwater management, and new native plants to support biodiversity and prevent erosion. The project will reduce future maintenance needs and support resilience of the local environment.

MidCoast Council - TAREE, NSW$300,000

Capping and Remediation at the Tuncurry landfill

MidCoast Council is capping and closing the Tuncurry landfill. The project will follow the approved capping and closure plan and NSW EPA guidelines.

MidCoast Council – TAREE, NSW$300,000

Capping and Remediation at the Taree landfill

MidCoast Council is capping the old landfill area at the Taree Waste Management Centre. The project will follow the approved capping design and closure plans and NSW EPA guidelines.

Moree Plains Shire Council$299,518

Biniguy Transfer Station

The old landfill in Biniguy, which doesn't properly contain waste, will be closed. A new staffed transfer station will be built to help sort, recycle, and dispose of waste more effectively. A Roll-on/Roff-off bin system will be installed to move waste to the Moree Waste Management Facility. This facility has better sorting for resource recovery and reducing landfill dependency. The project will reduce carbon emissions and environmental risks, helping to protect Slaughterhouse Creek from contamination. It will also improve operations and help stop illegal dumping. This project is a proactive, community-focused initiative.

Moree Plains Shire Council$297,900

Garah Transfer Station

Garah is upgrading its waste facility as part of Moree Plains Shire Council’s waste management strategy. The landfill system isn't fully supervised, causing illegal dumping, fires, and environmental risks. This project will close the landfill and build a staffed waste transfer station. A Roll-on/Roff-off bin system will collect mixed general waste. It will be taken to the Moree Waste Management Facility. There, waste will be sorted to recycle more and send less to landfill.

Murray River Council$300,000

Koraleigh Landfill Closure and Rehabilitation

After assessing all five rural landfills, Murray River Council found that Koraleigh poses the highest risk to the environment and the community. The landfill will be permanently closed. A best-practice rehabilitation plan will be created. A separate project will build a resource recovery centre. These steps will help protect the environment, make the area safer for community, and support better long-term waste management practices.

Murray River Council$64,915

New recycling equipment for Moama Waste Management Facility

Moama Waste Management Facility is upgrading its site with new equipment to help increase recycling. One is a cardboard baler that will recover and press clean cardboard into 400 kilogram bales. The other is a polystyrene compactor to recycle polystyrene and make it ready for transport to reprocessors. Right now, both materials take up lots of space in landfill - especially polystyrene. By using this equipment, the facility can save landfill space, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and make sure more waste gets recycled and reused.

Murray River Council$21,850

Koraleigh landfill rehabilitation design

Murray River Council is hiring a qualified engineer to design a rehabilitation plan for the Koraleigh landfill. The plan will include all technical specifications to complete the works, quality assurance, tender schedules and hold points. The designs will meet NSW EPA guidelines. Once finished, the plan will guide the work needed to rehabilitate the site and protect the environment.

Murrumbidgee Council$17,775

Planning better waste management for Murrumbidgee

Right now, there are landfills at Jerilderie and Coleambally, and a transfer station at Darlington Point. The Council is looking to hire experts to assess the sites and create a Landfill management Plan for consolidation and site transformation. The goal is to close one of the landfills and build two transfer stations. Waste from these transfer stations would then be taken to the Jerilderie landfill.

Narromine Shire Council$300,000

Closing Trangie Landfill and building a transfer station

Narromine Shire Council is closing the Trangie landfill as part of its 2020-2028 Waste Management Strategy. In its place, a new small vehicle waste transfer station will be built on the same site. The Council has created a plan to keep the community informed about when the landfill will close and how the new waste transfer station will be set up.

Narromine Shire Council$39,055

Narromine Waste Facility Improvements

A detailed 60-year plan was created in December 2024 for how the Narromine Waste Facility will be run over time. The plan looked at how current operations could be improved to better protect the environment and recover more recyclable materials. This project will look at how litter could be better controlled and contamination of recoverable and recyclable materials could be reduced. Putting these improvements in place has been made a top priority for how the site will run moving forward.

Oberon Council$12,945

Planning for Oberon Waste Facility

As part of its ongoing improvement plan, the Oberon Waste Facility is preparing key studies and designs to guide future operations. This project will include a final detailed landform design of existing cell, a water balance study, and development of a Surface Water & Leachate Management Plan. These documents will help the Council make decisions about management, compliance with regulations, and environmental protection measures.

Orange City Council$120,187

Upgrading the Ophir Road Resource Recovery Centre Landfill

The Ophir Road Resource Recovery Centre is getting an upgrade to improve safety and help recycle more. A new flat-floor area will be built for the public to drop off general waste, with four LBins for regular waste and one LBin for asbestos. These bins will have safety barriers to separate people, vehicles, and machinery, reducing the risk of falls. The system will reduce manual handling and offload time by as much as 75%. Staff will also be able to check each load, educate visitors, and help guide waste into the right bins so more materials can be reused or recycled.

Parkes Shire Council$210,400

Closing Alectown Landfill and building a Transfer Station

The Alectown landfill is a small, unsupervised and unlicenced site that will be closed. It currently has problems like illegal dumping, scavenging, fires, windblown litter, and limited recycling. Land area is nearly full. The project will fix these problems by stopping the need for new landfill trenches, rehabilitating the site, and setting up recycling equipment. Around 160 tonnes of mixed waste each year will be diverted, helping to reduce landfill use.

Uralla Shire Council$195,785

Uralla transfer station and landfill upgrades

Uralla Shire Council is improving how it handles waste at its three landfill sites: Uralla, Bundarra, and Kingstown. The project will consolidate waste operations to make them safer, more efficient, and in line with NSW EPA guidelines. As part of the upgrade, the Bundarra site will stop operating as a landfill and be converted to a waste transfer station. Across all sites, waste receival processes will be improved to stop problem or hazardous waste from entering the landfill. New practices will also help recover more materials that can be reused or recycled. Controls will be introduced to better spot and manage problem waste.

Wagga Wagga City Council$86,121

Upgrading polystyrene recycling at Gregadoo

Wagga Wagga City Council plans to install a new Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) compactor at the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre to deal with the rising amount of polystyrene waste. The current facilities use an outdated machine, and the new equipment will bring better, measurable processing methods. It will help recycle more EPS instead of sending it to landfill and support a circular economy by turning waste into new products. This upgrade will also promote more sustainable waste practices at the facility.

Round 1 to 4

The Landfill Consolidation and Environmental Improvements grants program was previously run between 2014 to 2018. Over $12 million in funding was awarded to 102 projects across 4 rounds.

Details of Rounds 1 to 4 are available on the NSW Environmental Trust’s website.

  • 2018 round 4: Total amount awarded $3.38 million
  • 2017 round 3: Total amount awarded $1.8million
  • 2015 round 2: Total amount awarded $2.9 million
  • 2014 round 1: Total amount awarded $3.83 million.

Project summaries and grants awarded are available on the NSW Environmental Trust’s website.